Java Performance Optimization - DZone Refcard

This post is to inform you that I published recently a recent refcard on Java Performance Optimization which is now available from DZone. Refcardz are basically “Cheat Sheets” which can be very useful for Developers and Application Support individuals.

I highly recommend that you download your own copy today, it is FREE!

http://refcardz.dzone.com/refcardz/java-performance-optimization

For now, find below a small teaser:

“It is possible to define “optimal performance” in different ways, but the basic elements are: the ability of a Java program to perform its computing tasks within the business response time requirements, and the ability of an application to fulfill its business functions under high volume, in a timely manner, with high reliability and low latency. Sometimes the numbers themselves become patternized: for some major websites, a page response time of 500ms maximum per user function is considered optimal. This Refcard will include target numbers when appropriate, but in most cases you will need to decide these on your own, based on business requirements and existing performance benchmarks…”

Please feel free to comment and ask me any question on this subject.

Thank you.

P-H

Read More

Java 8 is now released!

This post is to inform you that Java 8 has been officially released by Oracle. You can download the official release here.

In a nutshell:

• Lambda expressions: a new language feature  that enables you to treat functionality as a method argument, or code as data.
• Other significant enhancements and changes to the Java language and standard libraries including default methods, the new java.util.stream package, and the Date-Time API.
• Compact Profiles contain predefined subsets of the Java SE platform and enable applications that do not require the entire Platform to be deployed and run on small devices.
• Security enhancements include updates to the Java Cryptography Architecture; limited doPrivileged, a mechanism that enables code to assert a subset of its privileges; SSL/TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) Extension; and keystore enhancements.
• JavaFX documentation has been updated for this release.
• A new JavaScript engine, Nashorn, is included in JDK 8.
• Java Mission Control 5.3 is included in JDK 8.
• Decommission of the JVM Permanent Generation space and replaced by the Metaspace.

I will publish more articles in the upcoming weeks, including tutorials on Java Mission Control 5.3 which is now part of the JDK 8.

In the meantime, I suggest that you revisit my original article on the replacement of the HotSpot PermGen space by the Metaspace. I will publish the part 2 in the upcoming weeks.

Read More

ClassNotFoundException: is it slowing down your JVM?

Most Java developers are familiar with the infamous and very common java.lang.ClassNotFoundException. While the sources of this problem are generally well understood (missing classes/libraries in classpath, class loader delegation problems etc.), the impact to the overall JVM and performance is often unknown. This situation can lead to significant impacts to your application response time and scalability.

Large Java EE enterprise systems with multiple applications deployed are the most exposed to this type of problem due to the large number of different application classloaders active at runtime. This increases the risk of facing “undetected” ClassNotFoundException unless a clear business impact is identified and close log monitoring is implemented, results: on-going performance impact along with possible JVM class loading IO and Thread lock contention.

The following article and sample programs will demonstrate that any occurrence of ClassNotFoundException found from your client production systems should be taken very seriously and addressed promptly.

Java class loading: the missing link for optimal performance

Proper understanding of this performance problem starts with proper knowledge of the Java class loading model. ClassNotFoundException essentially means a failure of the JVM to locate and/or load a particular Java class such as:

• The Class.forName() method
• The ClassLoader.findSystemClass() method
• The ClassLoader.loadClass() method

While class loading of your application Java classes should occur only once in the JVM life-cycle (or through dynamic re-deploy functions), some applications also rely on dynamic class loading operations.

Regardless, repetitive valid and “failing” class loading operations can be quite intrusive, especially when the loading process is attempted by the default JDK java.lang.ClassLoader itself. Indeed, the default JDK 1.7+ behaviour, due to backward compatibility, will allow only one class to be loaded at the time, unless the class loader is tagged as “parallel capable”. Please keep in mind the even if the synchronization is done at the Class level only, a repetitive class loading failure against the same class name is still going to trigger thread lock contention depending of the Java thread concurrency level you are dealing with. The situation was much worst back with JDK 1.6 with synchronization done systematically at the class loader instance level.

For this reason, Java EE containers such as JBoss WildFly 8  are using their own internal concurrent class loaders for the loading of your application classes. These class loaders implements locking at a finer level of granularity, thus allowing loading different classes from the same instance of the class loader concurrently. This is also aligned with the latest JDK 1.7+ improvement introducing the support for Multithreaded Custom Class Loaders which also help prevent certain class loader deadlock scenarios.

That being said, class loading of system level classes such as java.* and Java EE container modules still fall back on the default JDK ClassLoader. This means that repetitive class loading failure for the same class name e.g. ClassNotFoundException can still trigger severe thread lock contention. This is precisely what we will replicate and demonstrate for the rest of the article.

Thread lock contention - problem replication

In order to recreate and simulate this problem, we created a simple application as per below specifications:

• A JAX-RS (REST) Web Service executing Class.forName() against a dummy Class name “located” from the system package level:

             String className = "java.lang.WrongClassName";

              Class.forName(className);

            

• JRE: HotSpot JDK 1.7 @64-bit
• Java EE container: JBoss WildFly 8
• Load testing tool: Apache JMeter
• Java monitoring: JVisualVM
• Java concurrency troubleshooting: JVM Thread Dump analysis

The simulation essentially executes concurrently with 20 threads the JAX-RS Web service. Each invocation generates a ClassNotFoundException. The logging was fully disabled in order to reduce impact on IO and focus on the class loading contention only.

 Now let’s look at the results from JVisualVM from our 30-60 seconds run. We can clearly see a lot of BLOCKED threads waiting to acquire a lock on an Object monitor.

Analysis of the JVM thread dump is clearly exposing the problem: Thread lock contention. We can see from the execution stack trace that JBoss delegates the loading of the class to the JDK ClassLoader…why? This is because our wrong Java class name is detected to be part of the system class path e.g. java.*. In this situation, JBoss will delegate the loading to the system class loader, triggering systematic synchronization for that particular class name and waiters from the other threads waiting to acquire a lock to load the same Class name.

Many threads waiting to acquire LOCK 0x00000000ab84c0c8…

"default task-15" prio=6 tid=0x0000000014849800 nid=0x2050 waiting for monitor entry [0x000000001009d000]              

   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)                                                                  

            at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:403)                                                             

               - waiting to lock <0x00000000ab84c0c8> (a java.lang.Object)
  // Waiting to acquire a LOCK held by Thread “default task-20”                                                     

               at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)                                                     

               at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356)    // JBoss now delegates to system ClassLoader..                                                          

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:371)                          

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.loadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:119)                                 

               at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)                                                                           

               at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186)                                                                           

               at org.jboss.tools.examples.rest.MemberResourceRESTService.SystemCLFailure(MemberResourceRESTService.java:176)       

               at org.jboss.tools.examples.rest.MemberResourceRESTService$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy.SystemCLFailure(Unknown Source) 

               at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor15.invoke(Unknown Source)                                                       

               at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)                             

               at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)    

……………………..                                                              

Culprit thread - default task-20

"default task-20" prio=6 tid=0x000000000e3a3000 nid=0x21d8 runnable [0x0000000010e7d000]                             

   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE                                                                                   

               at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method)                                                             

               at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Throwable.java:782)                                                        

               - locked <0x00000000a09585c8> (a java.lang.ClassNotFoundException)                                                 

               at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:287)                                                                  

               at java.lang.Exception.<init>(Exception.java:84)                                                                   

               at java.lang.ReflectiveOperationException.<init>(ReflectiveOperationException.java:75)                             

at java.lang.ClassNotFoundException.<init>(ClassNotFoundException.java:82) // ClassNotFoundException!                                      at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)                                                          

               at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)                                                          

               at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)                                                      

               at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)                                                      

               at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:423)                                                           

               - locked <0x00000000ab84c0e0> (a java.lang.Object)                                                                  

               at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:410)                                                           

- locked <0x00000000ab84c0c8> (a java.lang.Object)   // java.lang.ClassLoader: LOCK acquired                                                             at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)                                                   

               at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356)                                                           

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:371)                        

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.loadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:119)                               

               at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)                                                                         

               at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186)                                                                         

               at org.jboss.tools.examples.rest.MemberResourceRESTService.SystemCLFailure(MemberResourceRESTService.java:176)     

               at org.jboss.tools.examples.rest.MemberResourceRESTService$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy.SystemCLFailure(Unknown Source)

…………………………………

Now let’s replace our Class name by a Java class tagged as part of the “application” package and re-run the test under the same load conditions.

String className = "org.ph.WrongClassName";

Class.forName(className);

As we can see, we are no longer dealing with BLOCKED threads…why is that? Let’s have a look at the JVM thread dump to better understand this change of behaviour.

"default task-51" prio=6 tid=0x000000000dd33000 nid=0x200c runnable [0x000000001d76d000]                               

   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE                                                                                    

               at java.io.WinNTFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(Native Method)    // IO overhead due to JAR file search operation                                                   

               at java.io.File.exists(File.java:772)                                                                                

               at org.jboss.vfs.spi.RootFileSystem.exists(RootFileSystem.java:99)                                                   

               at org.jboss.vfs.VirtualFile.exists(VirtualFile.java:192)                                                            

               at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.module.VFSResourceLoader$2.run(VFSResourceLoader.java:127)                         

               at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.module.VFSResourceLoader$2.run(VFSResourceLoader.java:124)                         

               at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)                                                        

               at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.module.VFSResourceLoader.getClassSpec(VFSResourceLoader.java:124)                  

               at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.loadClassLocal(ModuleClassLoader.java:252)                                    

               at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader$1.loadClassLocal(ModuleClassLoader.java:76)                                   

               at org.jboss.modules.Module.loadModuleClass(Module.java:526)                                                         

               at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.findClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:189)   // JBoss now fully responsible to load the class                                      

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClassUnchecked(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:444) // Unchecked since using JDK 1.7 e.g. tagged as “safe” JDK                

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClassChecked(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:432)                   

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:374)                          

               at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.loadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:119)                                 

               at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)                                                                            

               at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186)                                                                           

               at org.jboss.tools.examples.rest.MemberResourceRESTService.AppCLFailure(MemberResourceRESTService.java:196)          

               at org.jboss.tools.examples.rest.MemberResourceRESTService$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy.AppCLFailure(Unknown Source)    

               at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor60.invoke(Unknown Source)    

……………….                                                  

The above execution stack trace is quite revealing:

• Since the Java class name was not detected to be part of the Java system package, no ClassLoader delegation was performed, thus no synchronization.
• Since JBoss considers JDK 1.7+ as a “safe” JDK, the ConcurrentClassLoader .performLoadClassUnchecked() method was used, not triggering any Object monitor lock.
• No synchronization means no Thread lock contention triggered as a result of the non-stop ClassNotFoundException error.

It is still important to note that while JBoss is doing a great job at preventing Thread lock contention in this scenario, the repetitive class loading attempt will still degrade the performance to a certain degree due to IO overhead associated with excessive JAR file search operations, again re-enforcing the need to take immediate corrective actions.

Final words

I hope that you enjoyed this article and have now a better understanding of potential performance impacts due to excessive class loading operations. While JDK 1.7 and modern Java EE containers brought great improvements on class loader related issues such as deadlocks and thread lock contention, potential problematic scenarios still remain. For this reason, I highly recommend that you closely monitor your application behaviour, logs and ensure that class loader related errors such as java.lang.ClassNotFoundException and java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError are aggressively corrected.

I’m looking forward for your comments and please share your troubleshooting experience with Java class loaders.

Read More

Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring 2013

As IT architects and consultants, it is crucial to ensure a highly performing, stable and scalable production environment for you client applications. Proper monitoring along with a comprehensive capacity planning model is crucial in order to achieve such goals.

While most performance data can be extracted at runtime through various OS commands and open source tools, large and complex IT production environments often requires the deployment of commercial grade APM solutions for an efficient management of the operations.

Before providing recommendations to your client and purchase the first APM product you find on the Web, it is important to properly review the different APM solutions and compare their product capabilities vs. your client operation needs and budget.

A trusted source of information I have been following since a few years now is the Gartner Magic Quadrant report for APM. Gartner’s APM yearly report is essentially an extensive research of every vendor that meets their qualifications. The process also includes customer interviews. The final report places each vendor on two axes, Completeness of Vision and Ability to Execute, and then places them accordingly on a Quadrant. If not done already, I recommend that you obtain your own copy of the 2013 report.

I will publish more articles this year and share my recent experience with top APM solutions such as New Relic, AppDynamics, Compuware DynaTrace and Dell Foglight.

Please do not hesitate to share your experience along with your constructive comments on APM solutions.

Reference

Some thoughts on the 2013 Gartner Magic Quadrant for APM

Read More